Axcan Scandipharm Inc. v. Ethex Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing a split of authority as to the application of Rule 9 in Lanham Act claims and, assuming heightened requirement applied, finding that false- advertising claim was sufficiently pleaded
• determining a complaint sufficiently alleged “when” by asserting the fraud was ongoing “since the late 1990’s”
• plaintiff sufficiently pleaded that alleged false advertising occurred \since the late 1990's\
• plaintiff sufficiently pleaded that alleged false advertising occurred “since the late 1990’s”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).