Jenson v. Eveleth Taconite Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “pet names” and terms that persons in romantic relationships might use such as “honey” and “babe” are sexual in nature
• holding that individual claimants are not entitled to any . rebuttable presumption at the individual relief phase
• explaining that only the objective showing is necessary in class action pattern-or-praetice litigation
• describing that many of the alleged instances of unwelcome sexual harassment applied to all women including visual references posted around the workplace and comments by male co-workers to groups of women
• applying modified Teamsters framework to pattern or practice hostile work environment claim
• class plaintiffs prevailed on hostile work environment claim where much of derogatory and insulting language used by men was directed at women in general

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).