Hawaii Supreme Court· 9/19/2006

Malahoff v. Saito

Citations

140 P.3d 401
111 Haw. 168

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

recognizing that “implicit within article XIII, section 2 is the right to collectively bargain over wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of employment”
recognizing that “implicit within article XIII, section 2 is the right to collectively bargain over ‘wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of employment’ ” as prescribed in HRS chapter 89
stating a rule similar to the Restatement but holding that it did not apply to the preliminary injunction in question
considering whether the Governor's and Comptroller's plan to implement a payroll lag under HRS § 78-13 [4] violated the constitutional right to organize for collective bargaining under article XIII, section 2 of the Hawai`i Constitution
considering whether the Governor’s and Comptroller’s plan to implement a payroll lag under HRS § 78-13 4 violated the constitutional right to organize for collective bargaining under article XIII, section 2 of the Hawaii Constitution
grant of preliminary injunction is \not a final judgment sufficient for collateral estoppel purposes\ unless intended as final resolution [internal quotation marks omitted]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moon, Levinson, Nakayama, Duffy, Acoba

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

63 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.