· 6/28/1977
Charles Starbuck v. City and County of San Francisco
Citations
- 556 F.2d 450
- 1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 12681
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The doctrine of stare decisis does not compel one district court judge to 27 follow the decision of another.”
- \The doctrine of stare decisis does not compel one district court judge to follow the decision of another.\
- \The doctrine of stare decisis does not compel one district court judge to follow the decision of another.\
- the Mandamus Act “does 20 not provide an independent ground for jurisdiction”
- Section 1361 “does not provide an independent ground for jurisdiction”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hufstedler, Goodwin, East
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.