Schefke v. Reliable Collection Agency, Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that non-compliance with HRAP Rule 28(b)(4) “offers sufficient grounds for the dismissal of the appeal”
• holding that Hawai'i courts have discretion to enhance lodestar when attorneys have accepted a case on a contingent fee basis
• concluding that fee awards can be justified based on the risks associated with accepting a case on a contingency fee basis
• concluding that fee awards can be justified based on the risks associated with accepting a case on a contingency fee basis
• concluding that fee awards can be justified based on the risks associated with accepting a case on a contingency fee basis
• concluding that fee awards can be justified based on the risks associated with accepting a case on a contingency fee basis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).