Coon v. City and County of Honolulu

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “it is axiomatic that an administrative rule cannot contradict or conflict with the statute it attempts to implement”
• stating that \it is axiomatic that an administrative rule cannot contradict or conflict with the statute it attempts to implement\
• stating that the rules of statutory construction require rejection of interpretation of a statute that renders any part of the statutory language a nullity
• stating that elevating form over substance is an approach the Supreme Court has repeatedly eschewed
• noting that \`[o]ur rules of statutory construction require[ ] us to reject an interpretation of [a] statute ... that renders any part of the statutory language a nullity'\
• noting that “ ‘[o]ur rules of statutory construction require[ ] us to reject an interpretation of [a] statute ... that renders any part of the statutory language a nullity’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).