Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Hawaii Supreme Court· 2/25/1969

Ellis v. Crockett

Citations

  • 451 P.2d 814
  • 51 Haw. 45
  • 1969 Haw. LEXIS 81

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the plaintiffs’ failure to allege an underlying claim of deceit precluded them from alleging conspiracy to deceive
  • holding that the plaintiffs’ failure to allege an underlying claim of deceit precluded them from alleging conspiracy to deceive
  • holding that \[c]ollateral estoppel... precludes the relitigation of a fact or issue which was previously determined in a prior suit on a different claim between the same parties or their privies\ (emphasis added)
  • holding that “[cjollateral es-toppel ... precludes the relitigation of a fact or issue which was previously determined in a prior suit on a different claim between the same parties or their privies” (emphasis added)
  • determining that the plaintiff did not allege any loss from the misrepresentations
  • in cases of fraud, there may be no recovery for mental anguish or humiliation not intentionally inflicted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Richardson, Marumoto, Abe, Levinson, King

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

107 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Ellis v. Crockett

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.