Ellis v. Crockett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiffs’ failure to allege an underlying claim of deceit precluded them from alleging conspiracy to deceive
• holding that the plaintiffs’ failure to allege an underlying claim of deceit precluded them from alleging conspiracy to deceive
• holding that \[c]ollateral estoppel... precludes the relitigation of a fact or issue which was previously determined in a prior suit on a different claim between the same parties or their privies\ (emphasis added)
• holding that “[cjollateral es-toppel ... precludes the relitigation of a fact or issue which was previously determined in a prior suit on a different claim between the same parties or their privies” (emphasis added)
• determining that the plaintiff did not allege any loss from the misrepresentations
• in cases of fraud, there may be no recovery for mental anguish or humiliation not intentionally inflicted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).