Skip to main content
· 8/10/1995

Hawkins v. State, Dept. of Economic SEC.

Citations

  • 900 P.2d 1236
  • 183 Ariz. 100
  • 196 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 49
  • 1995 Ariz. App. LEXIS 182
  • 68 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1178

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that although issue and claim preclusion “have similar purposes, they are nevertheless different”
  • “Where a party does not appeal a final administrative decision that decision becomes final and res judicata.”
  • failure to appeal final administrative decision renders that decision res judicata
  • “[W]hen an administrative agency is acting in a judicial capacity and resolves disputed issues of fact properly before it which the parties have had an adequate opportunity to litigate, the courts have not hesitated to apply res judicata to enforce repose.” (citations omitted
  • res judicata applies to certain administrative agency decisions
  • state law applies same criteria

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pelander, Livermore, Fernandez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.