Skip to main content

Loving v. State

Citations

  • 647 N.E.2d 1123
  • 1995 Ind. LEXIS 25
  • 1995 WL 109557

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that administrative questions such as a defendant’s name are “removed from the requirements of Miranda”
  • an officer’s knowledge and beliefs are relevant to the question of custody when conveyed through words or actions to the person being questioned
  • law enforcement officer's duty to give Miranda warnings does not attach unless person is in custody
  • routine administrative questions are removed from the requirements of Miranda

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dickson, Debruler, Sullivan, Selby, Shepard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

54 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.