Skip to main content
· 3/7/2013

Joseph Matheny v. State of Indiana

Citations

  • 983 N.E.2d 672
  • 2013 WL 842471

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that officer’s questions regarding the defendant’s address were routine identification questions even though the defendant’s answer was ultimately incriminating

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Crone, Mathias, Kirsch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.