Skip to main content

Love v. State

Citations

  • 741 N.E.2d 789
  • 2001 Ind. App. LEXIS 6
  • 2001 WL 26201

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that possession of large amounts of a narcotic substance is circumstantial evidence of intent to deliver
  • holding officer was clearly justified in stopping vehicle to investigate traffic infraction
  • revising a sentence of fifty years for possession with intent to deliver 11.33 grams of cocaine to the presumptive sentence of thirty years, despite the defendant’s lengthy juvenile history
  • “The more narcotics a person possesses, the stronger the inference that he intended to deliver it and not consume it personally.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brook, Sullivan, Najam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.