Datzek v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that officers had probable cause [2] to believe the defendant had driven while intoxicated after the defendant failed field sobriety tests
• holding stop of suspected drunk driver after driver failed to use turn signal was lawful
• providing that “[i]t is well-settled that a police officer may briefly detain a person whom the officer believes has committed an infraction”
• explaining that an officer may briefly detain a person whom the officer believes has committed an infraction such as failure to use a signal before turning
• finding that Pirtle does not apply to blood draws for blood alcohol content testing
• Pirtle inapplicable to chemical blood testing for blood alcohol content

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).