Skip to main content

Davis v. State

Citations

  • 791 N.E.2d 266
  • 2003 Ind. App. LEXIS 1233
  • 2003 WL 21575936

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that convictions may be sustained based on circumstantial evidence alone if the evidence supports a reasonable inference of guilt
  • holding that a police officer, testifying as a skilled witness, could opine as to characteristics that distinguish drug dealers from drug users, which included the packaging and amount of cocaine found
  • noting that an officer with experience investigating narcotics crimes was qualified to testify as a skilled witness regarding the packaging and amounts of cocaine related to dealing
  • finding intent to deliver where defendant possessed 10 5.6225 grams of cocaine packaged into forty-five bindles
  • “The more narcotics a person possesses, the stronger the inference that he intended to deliver it and not consume it personally.”
  • “Intent, being a mental state, can only be established by considering the behavior of the relevant actor, the surrounding circumstances, and the reasonable inferences to be drawn from them.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Riley, Sharpnack, Barnes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.