Indiana Court of Appeals· 8/14/2001
Wilson v. State
Citations
- 754 N.E.2d 950
- 2001 Ind. App. LEXIS 1389
- 2001 WL 911428
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- providing that one recognized exception to the warrant requirement is a search conducted incident to a lawful arrest
- providing that evidence resulting from a search incident to a lawful arrest is admissible at trial
- noting possession of a large quantity of drugs, money, plastic bags, and other paraphernalia is circumstantial evidence of intent to deliver
- trial court did not err in admitting into evidence drugs found during search of defendant's person during lawful arrest
- possession of large amount of cash and drugs packaged for sale permits inference of dealing
- explaining fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Robb, Baker, Friedlander
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Ammons v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2002-06-28· cited 41×
- Bennett v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2003-05-07· cited 40×
- Johnson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2002-04-18· cited 35×
- Fentress v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2007-03-30· cited 24×
- Antonio Garcia v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court· 2016-01-21· cited 24×
- Brown v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2002-09-16· cited 20×
- Neville v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2004-01-30· cited 18×
- Turner v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2006-03-10· cited 14×
- Roger Wilkinson v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2017-01-27· cited 13×
- Shirley v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2004-02-13· cited 12×
- Livermore v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2002-11-06· cited 7×
- Morgan K. Govan v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2019-01-25· cited 5×
- Garcia-Torres v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2009-09-30· cited 3×
- Jordan Jacobs v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2016-11-07· cited 1×
- Vinson Tate v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals· 2015-03-17
- Walter L. Robertson v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals· 2015-07-24
- Brandon L. Jones v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals· 2017-03-20
- Michael Thomas v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals· 2018-01-02
- John Wesley Ewing v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals· 2020-11-06
Cites
27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court· 1961-10-09· cited 9,088×
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 6,512×
- United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court· 1973-12-11· cited 3,538×
- Ybarra v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1980-01-21· cited 2,082×
- Thompson v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1985-01-21· cited 326×
- Lampkins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1997-10-09· cited 156×
- Reaves v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1992-02-17· cited 116×
- Berry v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1998-12-30· cited 78×
- Gibson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2000-07-31· cited 70×
- Sears v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1996-07-09· cited 67×
- Jackson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1996-07-23· cited 43×
- Love v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2001-01-11· cited 31×
- Regan v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1992-04-21· cited 31×
- State v. FarberIndiana Court of Appeals· 1997-03-26· cited 31×
- Culpepper v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1996-03-21· cited 26×
- Peete v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1997-04-09· cited 26×
- Santana v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1997-05-21· cited 25×
- Caudill v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1993-05-12· cited 24×
- Weaver v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1998-12-07· cited 23×
- Roberts v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1992-09-25· cited 23×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.