Peck v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the traffic stop of the defendant was justified despite the fact that defendant did not violate Indiana Code section 9-21-8-24 as charged by the State, but did violate Indiana Code section 9-21-8-25 by failing to use a turn signal when turning
• holding that the traffic stop of the defendant was justified despite the fact that defendant did not violate Indiana Code section 9-21-8-24 as charged by the State, but did violate Indiana Code section 9-21-8-25 by failing to use a turn signal when turning
• failure to signal before turning provided a basis for traffic stop

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Datzek v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2005-12-14· cited 34×
• Love v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2001-01-11· cited 31×
• Staten v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2011-04-18· cited 14×
• State v. Geis
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2002-12-18· cited 5×
• United States v. Gold
  S.D. Indiana· 1999-11-16· cited 1×
• Bryan C. Ellis v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2018-06-12

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Peck v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1998-12-29· cited 3×