Frink v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that no burden on prosecutor to develop evidence for defendant by questioning witness on prior inconsistent description of assailant
• holding that, under Alaska law, a prosecutor who presents a case to the grand jury has a duty to apprise the grand jurors of exculpatory evidence
• concluding that prosecutor’s presentation constituted “a reasonable and fair presentation” of relevant evidence
• explaining that the \requirement that the prosecutor present exculpatory evidence to the grand jury is implicit in the mandate of Criminal Rule 6(q)\
• noting that consultation with counsel was a factor supporting a voluntary consent to search
• noting that consultation with counsel was a factor supporting a voluntary consent to search

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).