Skip to main content

Love v. State

Citations

  • 559 So. 2d 198
  • 1990 WL 13581

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that when a defendant did not seek review in the supreme court of an appellate decision affirming his convictions but remanding for resentencing, the affirmance of his convictions became final and law of the case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ehrlich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.