Skip to main content
· 10/21/2009

Loos v. Napolitano

Citations

  • 665 F. Supp. 2d 1054
  • 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 97810
  • 2009 WL 3380975

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that plaintiff’s remedy for disability discrimination in her federal employment is the RA, and that claims under the ADA must be dismissed for failure to state a claim
  • stating that plaintiff’s remedy for disability discrimination in her federal employment is the Rehabilitation Act, and that claims under the ADA must be dismissed for failure to state a claim
  • concluding federal employee was not entitled to recover under ADA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Richard G. Kopf

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.