Charles Harris v. P.A.M. Transport, Inc. P.A.M. Transportation Services, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “failure to exhaust the remedies available under 49 C.F.R. §391.47 requires dismissal..., precluding Harris from obtaining review of his ADA claim in this court”
• affirming dismissal of an ADA claim where the employer “was applying the [DOT regulations] to which it was bound”
• failure to exhaust administrative remedies requires dismissal of ADA action, precluding plaintiff from obtaining review of his ADA claim
• “There is a long settled rule of judicial administration that no one is entitled to judicial relief for a supposed or threatened injury until the prescribed administrative remedy has been exhausted”
• “There is a long settled rule of judicial administration that no one is entitled to judicial relief for a supposed or threatened injury until the prescribed administrative remedy has been exhausted”
• “There is a long settled rule of judicial administration that no one is entitled to judicial relief for a supposed or threatened injury until the prescribed administrative remedy has been exhausted”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).