Skip to main content
· 12/30/1991

Norma F. Roth v. United States

Citations

  • 952 F.2d 611
  • 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 30222
  • 1991 WL 276189

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that in his complaint a plaintiff is obliged to allege facts regarding each essential element necessary to entitle him to recovery under an actionable legal theory
  • noting that after plaintiff resigned from defendant’s employ, she no longer had standing to enjoin her supervisor’s actions “in order to protect others or vindicate the public weal”
  • “In general, a federal employee whose position comes with CSRA’s reach may seek redress for the untoward effects of a prohibited personnel practice only through the panoply of remedies that CSRA itself affords.”
  • CSRA preempts state law claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Selya, Coffin, Cyr

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.