Wallace v. Dtg Operations, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “the timing in this instance strongly supports an inference of causation for the purpose of the prima facie case” where only fifteen days passed between the time plaintiff reported harassment and the time her employer made the decision to terminate her
• reversing district court's summary judgment on retaliation claim, in part because of evidence that employer treated plaintiff differently from other employees
• reversing grant of summary judgment based, in part, on the fact that the defendant decided to terminate the plaintiff “days after” he engaged in protected activity but “some two and a half months after the bulk of the accumulated misconduct [listed as the reason for the termination] occurred”
• \The plaintiff [in a retaliation case] must demonstrate that he or she took part in protected conduct ... and that there exists a causal nexus between the protected conduct and the adverse action.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).