· 7/27/1984
Dr. Bhartur N. Premachandra v. United States
Citations
- 739 F.2d 392
- 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 20109
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that if compensation is available under the Merit Systems Protection Board, a federal employee may not sue under the FTCA
- “Decisions regarding employment and termination . . . are precisely the types of administrative action the discretionary function exception seeks to shield.” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
- “Decisions regarding employment and termination . . . are precisely the types of administrative action the discretionary function exception seeks to shield.” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
- “Had Congress intended for such decisions to be reviewable in district courts in the context of actions under the Federal Tort Claims Act, it would not have so precisely defined the civil service remedy.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ross, Henley, Bowman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.