Skip to main content

Looney v. State

Citations

  • 941 So. 2d 1017
  • 2006 WL 1699512

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the trial court’s credibility determination will not be disturbed on appeal
  • stating “a diagnosis as a psychopath is a mental health factor viewed negatively by jurors and is not really considered mitigation”
  • stating “a diagnosis as a psychopath is a mental health factor viewed negatively by jurors and is not really considered mitigation”
  • “[S]trategic decisions do not constitute ineffective assistance of counsel if alternative courses have been considered and rejected and counsel’s decision was reasonable under the norms of professional conduct.” (quoting Howell v. State, 877 So. 2d 697, 703 (Fla. 2004))
  • “[S]trategic decisions do not constitute ineffective assistance of counsel if alternative courses have been considered and rejected and counsel’s decision was reasonable under the norms of professional conduct,” (quoting Howell v. State, 877 So.2d 697, 703 (Fla. 2004))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.