Skip to main content

Douglas v. State

Citations

  • 141 So. 3d 107
  • 2012 WL 16745

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding the defendant failed to establish prejudice where the proposed evidence would have opened the door to other damaging testimony
  • “[H]e is procedurally barred from raising these substantive claims because he could and should have raised them on direct appeal, but he failed to do so.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Canady, Labarga, Lewis, Only, Pariente, Perry, Polston, Quince

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

57 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.