Skip to main content

Lewis v. State

Citations

  • 754 So. 2d 897
  • 2000 WL 461218

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a police officer’s testimony based on general patterns of criminal behavior “encroached on the jury’s prerogative to decide between conflicting facts, to draw inferences from the facts, and to reach factual conclusions”
  • “[I]n reviewing the denial of the motion [for judgment of acquittal], we are to consider all evidence admitted at trial, whether or not it was erroneously admitted.”
  • “Where either the ‘custody’ or ‘interrogation’ prong is absent, Miranda does not require warnings.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Browning

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.