Skip to main content

Allred v. State

Citations

  • 622 So. 2d 984
  • 1993 WL 241041

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that routine booking questions do not require Miranda warnings because they are not designed to lead to an incriminating response; rather, they are designed to lead to essential biographical data
  • field sobriety tests requiring a testimonial response implicate the privilege against compelled self-incrimination under the Florida Constitution and require Miranda warnings
  • routine booking questions, such as “[n]ame, address, height, weight, eye color, date of birth, and current age,” are not subject to Miranda
  • under Traylor v. State, 596 So. 2d 956 [Fla. 1992], alphabet recitation test is “[i]nterrogation[:] . . . express questions . . . that a reasonable person would conclude are designed to lead to an incriminating response”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shaw

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.