Supreme Court of Florida· 7/1/1993
Allred v. State
Citations
- 622 So. 2d 984
- 1993 WL 241041
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that routine booking questions do not require Miranda warnings because they are not designed to lead to an incriminating response; rather, they are designed to lead to essential biographical data
- field sobriety tests requiring a testimonial response implicate the privilege against compelled self-incrimination under the Florida Constitution and require Miranda warnings
- routine booking questions, such as “[n]ame, address, height, weight, eye color, date of birth, and current age,” are not subject to Miranda
- under Traylor v. State, 596 So. 2d 956 [Fla. 1992], alphabet recitation test is “[i]nterrogation[:] . . . express questions . . . that a reasonable person would conclude are designed to lead to an incriminating response”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Shaw
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Voorhees v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1997-06-19· cited 78×
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Florida· 1995-01-05· cited 58×
- State v. MeadorDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-05-15· cited 43×
- People v. BejasaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2012-04-19· cited 43×
- State v. BurnsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-08-25· cited 24×
- Vanhouton v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1997-03-03· cited 21×
- Lewis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-04-25· cited 17×
- Hourigan v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 1998-01-22· cited 17×
- State v. RheaumeSupreme Court of Vermont· 2004-04-09· cited 17×
- Commonwealth v. HayesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-04-17· cited 16×
- Timmons v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-08-01· cited 14×
- State v. DevlinMontana Supreme Court· 1999-04-28· cited 13×
- Vickers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1994-06-15· cited 10×
- GREG SENSER v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-05-09· cited 8×
- Burns v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1996-07-18· cited 7×
- State v. ModesteDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-08-08· cited 6×
- State v. WhelanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-03-10· cited 6×
- State v. EvansDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-04-30· cited 5×
- Thompson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-02-09· cited 5×
- Burkes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-09-16· cited 4×
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1966-06-20· cited 6,067×
- Pennsylvania v. MunizSupreme Court· 1990-06-18· cited 976×
- Doe v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1988-06-22· cited 420×
- Traylor v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1992-01-16· cited 375×
- State v. DiandreaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-07-08· cited 4×
- Contino v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-05-29· cited 3×
- State v. AllredDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-07-08· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.