Skip to main content

Redd v. State

Citations

  • 49 So. 3d 329
  • 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 18654
  • 2010 WL 4967664

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that testifying officer’s testimony about why a codefendant was not charged was not “misleading or so incomplete as to be unfair” such that “the door was not opened to the admission of hearsay to explain, qualify, or limit his answers”
  • “We are required to consider even erroneously admitted evidence when reviewing the denial of a motion for judgment of acquittal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clark, Kahn, Lewis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.