Damen v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \[P]ackaging the items to look like crack cocaine did not constitute the necessary false identification of the substance.\
• “[P]ackaging the items to look like crack cocaine did not constitute the necessary false identification of the substance.”
• “[P]ackaging the items to look like crack cocaine did not constitute the necessary false identification of the substance.”
• noting with approval the witness's statement that he was not qualified to offer testimony concerning the inner workings of the defendant's mind and so could not testify as to the defendant's actual intent
• providing examples of fact versus opinion testimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).