Continental Basketball Ass'n v. Ellenstein Enterprises, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a contract made in violation of the Indiana Franchise Acts was not automatically void because the legislature did not use the terms “void” or “unenforceable” in the statute and included a remedial provision for violations
• concluding that a contract made in violation of the Indiana Franchise Acts was not automatically void because the legislature did not use the terms “void” or “unenforceable” in the statute and included a remedial provision for violations
• quoted in Matter of Estate of Kent, 82 N.E.3d 326, 331 (Ind. Ct. App. 2017), trans. granted
• quoted in Matter of Estate of Kent , 82 N.E.3d 326 , 331 (Ind. Ct. App. 2017), trans. granted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).