Skip to main content

McElroy v. State

Citations

  • 864 N.E.2d 392
  • 2007 Ind. App. LEXIS 754
  • 2007 WL 1121459

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a petitioner’s failure to present evidence from counsel can support an inference that counsel would not have corroborated the petitioner’s allegations
  • concluding that, under “either the statutory elements test or the actual evidence test,” each charged offense “requires” proof of facts not required by the other
  • when guilty plea was entered without the benefit of a plea agreement: defendant “may raise, a double jeopardy argument” on direct appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Vaidik, Baker, Bailey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.