Skip to main content
· 8/29/1989

Styers v. SUPERIOR COURT IN & FOR CTY. OF MOHAVE

Citations

  • 779 P.2d 352
  • 161 Ariz. 477
  • 42 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 12
  • 1989 Ariz. App. LEXIS 226

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding: “One may acknowledge the fact of treatment without consenting to the disclosure of its confidential details.”
  • finding privileged records “irrelevant to any issue appropriate to the dissolution”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fidel, Gerber, Grant

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.