· 6/6/1978
China Doll Restaurant, Inc. v. Schweiger
Citations
- 580 P.2d 776
- 119 Ariz. 315
- 1978 Ariz. App. LEXIS 501
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding appellate court lacked jurisdiction over action that occurred two months after notice of appeal was filed and that was not stated in notice of appeal
- court of appeals has no jurisdiction to consider an issue not contained in the notice of appeal
- Court of Appeals acquires no jurisdiction to determine the propriety of the superior court’s action when the action occurs after the notice of appeal was filed
- “Since this action was not contained in the notice of appeal, and in fact occurred . . . after the notice of appeal was filed, we acquired no jurisdiction to determine this issue.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jacobson, Ogg, Wren
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.