Skip to main content
· 6/6/1978

China Doll Restaurant, Inc. v. Schweiger

Citations

  • 580 P.2d 776
  • 119 Ariz. 315
  • 1978 Ariz. App. LEXIS 501

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding appellate court lacked jurisdiction over action that occurred two months after notice of appeal was filed and that was not stated in notice of appeal
  • court of appeals has no jurisdiction to consider an issue not contained in the notice of appeal
  • Court of Appeals acquires no jurisdiction to determine the propriety of the superior court’s action when the action occurs after the notice of appeal was filed
  • “Since this action was not contained in the notice of appeal, and in fact occurred . . . after the notice of appeal was filed, we acquired no jurisdiction to determine this issue.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jacobson, Ogg, Wren

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.