· 7/17/2014
In Re the Marriage of Thorn
Citations
- 235 Ariz. 216
- 330 P.3d 973
- 691 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 31
- 2014 WL 3537129
- 2014 Ariz. App. LEXIS 122
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the family court can order a spouse to return sole and separate property, even if the property has declined in value or changed form
- “Having successfully persuaded the court to follow this approach, he cannot now argue it was erroneous.”
- distinguishing Weaver and concluding that subject matter jurisdiction is not “coterminous” with the family court’s authority to act pursuant to the marital statutes
- affirming family court’s authority to order return of party’s sole and separate property
- “[T]his court only acquires jurisdiction over those matters identified in a timely filed notice of appeal.”
- we “only acquire[] jurisdiction over those matters identified in a timely filed notice of appeal”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Miller, Vásquez, Espinosa
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.