Skip to main content
· 7/17/2014

In Re the Marriage of Thorn

Citations

  • 235 Ariz. 216
  • 330 P.3d 973
  • 691 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 31
  • 2014 WL 3537129
  • 2014 Ariz. App. LEXIS 122

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the family court can order a spouse to return sole and separate property, even if the property has declined in value or changed form
  • “Having successfully persuaded the court to follow this approach, he cannot now argue it was erroneous.”
  • distinguishing Weaver and concluding that subject matter jurisdiction is not “coterminous” with the family court’s authority to act pursuant to the marital statutes
  • affirming family court’s authority to order return of party’s sole and separate property
  • “[T]his court only acquires jurisdiction over those matters identified in a timely filed notice of appeal.”
  • we “only acquire[] jurisdiction over those matters identified in a timely filed notice of appeal”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Miller, Vásquez, Espinosa

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.