Skip to main content
· 11/15/1984

Wendling v. Southwest Savings & Loan Ass'n

Citations

  • 694 P.2d 1213
  • 143 Ariz. 599
  • 1984 Ariz. App. LEXIS 573

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding party failed to establish newly discovered evidence where “both witnesses furnishing the allegedly newly discovered evidence was known” prior to entry of judgment
  • stating that this court lacks jurisdiction to review matters not contained in the notice of appeal (citations omitted)
  • stating that a court will only grant a new trial if it appears the newly discovered evidence could not have been discovered earlier by exercise of due diligence
  • “This court lacks jurisdiction to review matters not contained in the Notice of Appeal.”
  • “This court lacks jurisdiction to review matters not contained in the Notice of Appeal.”
  • “This court lacks jurisdiction to review matters not contained in the Notice of Appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brooks, Haire, Grant

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.