Court of Appeals of Arizona· 6/25/1987

Reed v. Reed

Citations

740 P.2d 963
154 Ariz. 101
1987 Ariz. App. LEXIS 423

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that trial court’s “limited, generalized determinations” of financial matters were inadequate and noting that it “failed to set forth even the most rudimentary arithmetic basis for the particular monthly increase it ordered petitioner to pay”
reversing a superior court order for insufficient evidence where there was no breakdown between the children’s and parent’s separate needs
reversing attorneys’ fee award on due process grounds where the trial court had “effectively refused to allow petitioner to be heard on the subject of the reasonableness and appropriateness of the fees and expenses claimed”
trial court failed to comply with Arizona Rule of Civil Procedure 52(a) because it did not “set forth even the most rudimentary arithmetic basis” for the monthly increase it ordered

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eubank, Kleinschmidt, Jacobson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.