Skip to main content

Hunter v. State

Citations

  • 919 A.2d 63
  • 397 Md. 580
  • 2007 Md. LEXIS 108

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The possible prejudicial effect . . . is demonstrated by . . . most importantly, the jury’s behavior during its deliberations.”
  • prosecutor’s questions to defendant about whether police were lying were “impermissible as a matter of law because they encroached on the province of the jury” by asking defendant to assess credibility of other witnesses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cathell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.