Court of Appeals of Maryland· 5/8/2006

Kelly v. State

Citations

898 A.2d 419
392 Md. 511
2006 Md. LEXIS 251

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that the trial court has limited discretion in excluding all testimony from all factual witnesses of a particular party
noting that a defendant’s right to compulsory process does not “confer a right to present inadmissible evidence”
“[I]t is incumbent upon the State to make the objections to the testimony as it is elicited by the defense.”
“[I]t is incumbent upon the State to make the objections to the testimony as it is elicited by the defense.”
“[H]earsay is only excluded upon an objection to it. It may be very relevant.”
“[H]earsay is only excluded upon an objection to it. It may be very relevant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cathell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

50 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.