Skip to main content
· 6/10/2005

Lane v. Lucent Technologies, Inc.

Citations

  • 388 F. Supp. 2d 590
  • 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27128
  • 2005 WL 1389430

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that plaintiff is pro se

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bullock

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.