Haynes v. Williams

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that an individual supervisor is the alter ego of the employer where the supervisor “exercises significant control” and therefore the “individual qualifies as an ‘employer’ under Title VII solely for purposes of imputing liability to the true employer.”
• describing as a “purely legal question” whether an individual supervisor is personally liability under Title VII.
• “The relief granted under Title VII is against the employer, not individual employees whose actions would constitute a violation of the Act.”
• “[W]hen faced with an intra-circuit conflict, a panel should follow earlier, settled precedent over a subsequent deviation therefrom.”
• “The relief granted under Title VII is against the employer, not individual employees whose actions would constitute a violation of the Act.”
• “The relief granted under Title VII is against the employer, not individual employees whose actions would constitute a violation of the Act.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).