D.C. Circuit· 7/28/1995

Coramae Ella Gary v. James Edward Long

Citations

59 F.3d 1391
313 U.S. App. D.C. 403
1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 19976
66 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,660
68 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 581
1995 WL 443795

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

recognizing that the employer is “alone liable for the violation of Title VII” arising from harassment by a supervisor
holding that although supervisory employees may be named as parties in Title VII claims, they may not be held personally liable for violations of Title VII
holding that Title VII only allows for relief against the employer, and not against an employee in his individual capacity whose conduct formed the basis of the claim
holding that “the obvious purpose” of an analogous “agent provision [in Title VII] was to incorporate respondeat superior liability into the statute” (internal quotation omitted)
holding that a federal employee's claim against an individual defendant \essentially merges with [his] claim against [the agency]\ because an individual \cannot be held liable in his personal capacity\
holding that a federal employee’s claim against an individual defendant “essentially merges with [his] claim against [the agency]” because an individual “cannot be held liable in his personal capacity”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Buckley, Williams, Sentelle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

260 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.