John D. Holley v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• confirming that “when an action is stigmatizing there is an enhanced right to a hearing”
• holding that the Military Pay Act is a money-mandating statute
• requiring a money-mandating statute be applicable for both damages and ancillary relief for wrongful discharge
• “It is well established that [the Military Pay Act] serves as the money-mandating statute applicable to military personnel claiming damages and ancillary relief for wrongful discharge.”
• “It is well established that 37 U.S.C. § 204 * * * serves as the money-mandating statute applicable to military personnel claiming damages and ancillary relief for wrongful discharge.”
• “Determination of jurisdiction starts with the complaint, which must be well-pleaded in that it must state the necessary elements of the plaintiffs claim, independent of any defense that may be interposed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).