Paskert v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that ABCMR decision to separate officer was supported although the officer alleged that a personality conflict tainted his ratings, in part because the rater testified that there was no personality conflict
• refusing to overturn board decision unless forbidden factors were present in ratings process and adversely affected ratings
• explaining the NDRB’s finding that Plaintiff’s discharge “was proper and equitable at the time of discharge”
• noting military regulations “were designed specifically to give members of the military a useable administrative process by which to present their claims without the entanglements of an entire due process structure”
• “[S]er-vice members have no constitutional rights to remain on active duty, and their rights are defined by the applicable statutes and regulations.”
• “[Service members have no right to remain on active duty, and their rights are defined by the applicable statutes and regulations.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Milas v. United States
  Federal Claims· 1999-01-20· cited 51×
• Martinez v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1992-10-28· cited 37×
• Berry v. United States
  Federal Claims· 1992-11-10· cited 22×
• Ashgar v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1991-06-20· cited 19×
• Allred v. United States
  Federal Claims· 1995-05-09· cited 17×
• Rebosky v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2004-03-04· cited 17×
• Philip L. Anderson v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2013-06-06· cited 15×
• Muse v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1990-10-19· cited 15×
• Golding v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2001-03-01· cited 11×
• Doe v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2005-06-30· cited 11×
• Epstein v. Geren
  District of Columbia· 2008-03-25· cited 10×
• United States Ex Rel. Karr v. Castle
  D. Delaware· 1990-08-31· cited 9×
• Vierrether v. United States
  Federal Claims· 1992-12-23· cited 8×
• Yount v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1991-06-12· cited 6×
• Cameron v. United States
  Federal Claims· 1995-10-31· cited 5×
• Mai v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1991-03-12· cited 5×
• Kinney v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2001-11-30· cited 4×
• Kelly v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2021-11-19

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• United States v. Testan
  Supreme Court· 1976-05-03· cited 3,918×
• United States v. King
  Supreme Court· 1969-05-19· cited 1,604×
• Skinner v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1979-02-21· cited 182×
• Hary v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1980-03-19· cited 109×
• United States v. Wickersham
  Supreme Court· 1906-04-02· cited 84×
• Dorl v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1973-02-16· cited 81×
• Grieg v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1981-01-28· cited 57×
• Boyd v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1975-05-14· cited 54×
• Dorl v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1973-11-12· cited 54×
• Armstrong v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1974-12-18· cited 53×
• Guy v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1979-10-17· cited 48×
• Koster v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1982-07-28· cited 37×
• Skaradowski v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1973-01-18· cited 36×
• Gregory Alberico v. The United States
  Federal Circuit· 1986-02-10· cited 32×
• Gary C. Hoffman v. The United States
  Federal Circuit· 1990-01-18· cited 27×
• Duhon v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1972-06-16· cited 27×
• Crispino v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1983-08-22· cited 24×
• Braddock v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1986-01-31· cited 19×
• Tanaka
  Court of Claims· 1976-06-11· cited 18×
• Harris v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1987-12-11· cited 13×