Skip to main content
· 9/12/1977

Mister Ralpho v. J. Raymond Bell, Chairman, Foreign Claims Settlement Commission of the United States

Citations

  • 569 F.2d 607
  • 186 U.S. App. D.C. 368

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting legislative history’s “marked silence” on preclusion of judicial review for constitutional claims
  • construing the Micronesian Claims Act in light of the Act's purposes, its'legislative history, the interpretation of analogous statutory provisions, and the Trusteeship Agreement's human rights guarantees
  • construing the Micronesian Claims Act in harmony with the Trusteeship Agreement's human rights guarantees
  • “[a]n opportunity to meet and rebut evidence utilized by an administrative agency has long been regarded as a primary requisite of due process”
  • panel cannot blindly follow prior ruling in the face of clearly controlling doctrine later enunciated by the Supreme Court
  • panel cannot blindly follow prior ruling in the face of clearly controlling doctrine later enunciated by the Supreme Court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: III, McGOWAN, Robinson, Spottswood, Wilkey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.