· 9/12/1977
Mister Ralpho v. J. Raymond Bell, Chairman, Foreign Claims Settlement Commission of the United States
Citations
- 569 F.2d 607
- 186 U.S. App. D.C. 368
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting legislative history’s “marked silence” on preclusion of judicial review for constitutional claims
- construing the Micronesian Claims Act in light of the Act's purposes, its'legislative history, the interpretation of analogous statutory provisions, and the Trusteeship Agreement's human rights guarantees
- construing the Micronesian Claims Act in harmony with the Trusteeship Agreement's human rights guarantees
- “[a]n opportunity to meet and rebut evidence utilized by an administrative agency has long been regarded as a primary requisite of due process”
- panel cannot blindly follow prior ruling in the face of clearly controlling doctrine later enunciated by the Supreme Court
- panel cannot blindly follow prior ruling in the face of clearly controlling doctrine later enunciated by the Supreme Court
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: III, McGOWAN, Robinson, Spottswood, Wilkey
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.