Supreme Court· 1/10/2012

Gonzalez v. Thaler

Citations

181 L. Ed. 2d 619
2012 U.S. LEXIS 574
132 S. Ct. 641
565 U.S. 134
80 U.S.L.W. 4045
23 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 23
2012 WL 43513

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that a conviction becomes final under 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (d)(1)(A) when the Supreme Court denies a petition for writ of certiorari
holding that under § 2244(d)(1)(A) a judgment becomes final “when the time for pursuing direct review in [the Supreme Court], or in state court, expires”
holding that, under § 2244(d)(1)(A), a judgment becomes final “when the time for pursuing direct review in [the Supreme Court], or in state court, expires”
holding that a petitioner’s case becomes final when the time for pursuing direct review expires
holding that, when a petitioner does not seek certiorari, a judgment becomes final when the time for filing a certiorari petition expires
holding that, for petitioners who do not seek a writ of certiorari, the judgment becomes final when the time for filing expires

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alito, Breyer, Ginsburg, Kagan, Kennedy, Roberts, Scalia, Sotomayor, Thomas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

459 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

57 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Gonzalez v. Thaler

7 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.