Supreme Court· 4/21/1992

Taylor v. Freeland & Kronz

Citations

503 U.S. 638
112 S. Ct. 1644
118 L. Ed. 2d 280
1992 U.S. LEXIS 2546

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that after time to file objection has run, exemption cannot be contested, “whether or not [the debtor] had a colorable statutory basis for claiming it”
holding that a failure to object to exemption claims within the time provided under Bankruptcy Rule 4003(b) acts as a bar to later objections
holding that, unless a party in interest objects, property claimed as exempt is deemed exempt, even absent a colorable statutory basis for claiming the exemption
holding that failure to timely object to an exemption precludes a challenge to such an exemption
holding that failure to timely object constitutes a waiver of the right to contest the debtor’s exemption claim
holding that a Chapter 7 trustee could not contest the validity of claimed exemptions after the 30-day period for objecting had expired and no extension had been obtained

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thomas, Rehnquist, White, Blackmun, O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, Souter, Stevens

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

704 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.