Katie Lowery v. Honeywell International, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that all of the original Lowery plaintiffs were Alabama residents
• noting that some of the Lowery defendants were Alabama corporations
• “Absent specific detail about the present action, the supplement in no way clarifies the aggregate value of the claims here.”
• “[T]he plain language of [28 U.S.C. § 1332(d)(11)(A)] makes it clear that any ‘mass action’ is also considered a ‘class action’ for the purposes of CAFA’s removal provisions.”
• referring to the “documents before the court”
• “[T]he court [will] not reserve ruling on the motion to dismiss in order to allow the plaintiff to look for what the plaintiff should have had – but did not – before coming through the courthouse doors, even though the court would have the inherent power to do so.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).