· 1/25/1985
Rulli v. Dunn
Citations
- 487 A.2d 430
- 337 Pa. Super. 613
- 1985 Pa. Super. LEXIS 5564
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding order was not final because it ordered appellant to comply with order within ten days or face sanctions in the future
- holding order was not final because it ordered appellant to comply with order within ten days or face sanctions in the future
- holding order was not final because it ordered appellant to comply with order within ten days or face sanctions in the future
- holding order was not final because it ordered appellant to comply with order within ten days or face sanctions in the future
- holding order was not final because it ordered appellant to comply with order within ten days or face sanctions in the future
- holding order was not final because it ordered appellant to comply with order within ten days or face sanctions in the future
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rowley, Hester, Roberts
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.