Brodsky v. Philadelphia Athletic Club, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding order was not final because chancellor merely threatened to hold party in contempt and issue jail time and fine in future if a decree was not performed
• holding order was not final because chancellor merely threatened to hold party in contempt and issue jail time and fine in future if a decree was not performed
• holding order was not final because chancellor merely threatened to hold party in contempt and issue jail time and fine in future if a decree was not performed
• holding order was not final because chancellor merely threatened to hold party in contempt and issue jail time and fine in future if a decree was not performed
• holding order was not final because chancellor merely threatened to hold party in contempt and issue jail time and fine in future if a decree was not performed
• holding order was not final because chancellor merely threatened to hold party in contempt and issue jail time and fine in future if a decree was not performed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).