Skip to main content
· 11/13/1981

Hester v. Bagnato

Citations

  • 437 A.2d 66
  • 292 Pa. Super. 322
  • 1981 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3759

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that “[i]t is clear that, unless sanctions are imposed, an order declaring a party in contempt is interlocutory”
  • holding order adjudicating appellant in contempt but giving appellant opportunity to purge himself by paying a settlement sum appellant was previously ordered to pay was not a final order
  • holding order adjudicating appellant in contempt but giving appellant opportunity to purge himself by paying a settlement sum appellant was previously ordered to pay was not a final order
  • holding order adjudicating appellant in contempt but giving appellant opportunity to purge himself by paying a settlement sum appellant was previously ordered to pay was not a final order
  • holding order adjudicating appellant in contempt but giving appellant opportunity to purge himself by paying a settlement sum appellant was previously ordered to pay was not a final order
  • holding order adjudicating appellant in contempt but giving appellant opportunity to purge himself by paying a settlement sum appellant was previously ordered to pay was not a final order

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cercone, Montgomery, Van Voort

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.