Skip to main content

Sargent v. Sargent

Citations

  • 733 A.2d 640
  • 1999 Pa. Super. 151
  • 1999 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1857

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “[u]ntil sanctions or imprisonment are actually imposed, an order declaring a party in contempt is interlocutory and not appealable”
  • holding order was not final because “threatened sanction of imprisonment may or may not be imposed in the future depending on whether [ajppellant pays the past due support”
  • holding order was not final because “threatened sanction of imprisonment may or may not be imposed in the future depending on whether [ajppellant pays the past due support”
  • holding order was not final because “threatened sanction of imprisonment may or may not be imposed in the future depending on whether [ajppellant pays the past due support”
  • holding order was not final because “threatened sanction of imprisonment may or may not be imposed in the future depending on whether [a]ppellant pays the past due support”
  • holding order was not final because “threatened sanction of imprisonment may or may not be imposed in the future depending on whether [ajppellant pays the past due support”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sole, Lally-Green, Montemuro

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.